<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contact</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/contact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com</link>
	<description>Movies as mythologically informed literature.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:44:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kyle W. Elsbernd</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/contact/comment-page-1/#comment-2955</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle W. Elsbernd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/wp/contact/#comment-2955</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m trying to find your post called (roughly) &quot;On stupidity in culture&quot; mentioned in your interview with Josh Wagner pt.2. Where is it archived?

Thanks again for an excellent resource. I shall be buying your book on amazon today.

Kyle Elsbernd 
Wisconsin USA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to find your post called (roughly) &#8220;On stupidity in culture&#8221; mentioned in your interview with Josh Wagner pt.2. Where is it archived?</p>
<p>Thanks again for an excellent resource. I shall be buying your book on amazon today.</p>
<p>Kyle Elsbernd<br />
Wisconsin USA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damon heneger</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/contact/comment-page-1/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>damon heneger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/wp/contact/#comment-803</guid>
		<description>In addition to my last question I found this clip today on youtube by allen watts called &quot;who guards the guards?&quot;. 

Check it out   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aL09_HtGRHU

or



thanks
damon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to my last question I found this clip today on youtube by allen watts called &#8220;who guards the guards?&#8221;. </p>
<p>Check it out   <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aL09_HtGRHU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aL09_HtGRHU</a></p>
<p>or</p>
<p>thanks<br />
damon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damon heneger</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/contact/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>damon heneger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/wp/contact/#comment-799</guid>
		<description>I was interested in your views on two new movies coming out, the acting is rather inconsequential but the story line --here is my interest. Knowing and Watchmen.

thanks
damon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was interested in your views on two new movies coming out, the acting is rather inconsequential but the story line &#8211;here is my interest. Knowing and Watchmen.</p>
<p>thanks<br />
damon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John David Ebert</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/contact/comment-page-1/#comment-613</link>
		<dc:creator>John David Ebert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 06:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/wp/contact/#comment-613</guid>
		<description>Dear James:

Have you read Slavoj Zizek at all? I&#039;ve been reading his stuff lately and though he is a Marxist, he writes like Thompson in that he draws on a broad range of references from Hegel to the latest pop movies. He is incredibly erudite and learned, just like Thompson. He differs from Thompson, however, in that he is a Marxist and therefore also a materialist. But he is funny and witty and cranky.

There is also Camille Paglia who is broadly learned and erudite with a sweeping interest in the humanities and a very sharp tongue. Her best days, however, I think are behind her. Try one of her essay collections.

There is also Jean Baudrillard, who is a sort of French po-mo equivalent of Thompson. He is very readable and insightful about culture, top or pop. One of his best collections is called &quot;Screened Out,&quot; and it&#039;s a good place to start, since his essays there are particularly readable and intelligible.

And don&#039;t let me forget Paul Virilio, another great French thinker. He is still alive and he is very good at commenting on technology, especially military technology and its recent transformations. Unlike Baudrillard, he is more of a traditional humanist. He is not difficult to read or understand and he is very insightful about media. If you like McLuhan, I recommend him particularly. Try &quot;Open Sky&quot; or &quot;The Original Accident&quot; or &quot;City of Panic.&quot;

You might also try my book on movies which is heavily indebted to Thompson, who wrote the Forward for it. It&#039;s available on Amazon. 

That&#039;s about it, as far as I know. Nowadays well rounded intellectuals are few and far between. Academe has crushed them by insisting upon degrees and specialization and so the days of Lewis Mumford, Marshall McLuhan and Bill Thompson are pretty much a thing of the past.

Publishers and greedy agents are also to blame, for they no longer take chances on intellectual writers since all they&#039;re looking to do is make a buck. Integrity, as far as I can tell, can no longer be found amongst publishers or agents, so many intellectuals, such as myself, have had to resort to Print on Demand or self publishing, which renders you effectively invisible. The insistence on making money is essentially screening out and preventing new intellectuals who are not affiliated with Academe from emerging into the spotlight. If you are too intellectual, trade publishers will not publish you; and if you go to academic publishers, they will tell you your work is not academic enough. So we have lost that middle ground which once could serve as a forum in which public intellectuals (and I don&#039;t mean journalists of the Thomas Friedman type here) like Lewis Mumford or Jane Jacobs could function. 

Hope this helps.

Best,
John David Ebert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear James:</p>
<p>Have you read Slavoj Zizek at all? I&#8217;ve been reading his stuff lately and though he is a Marxist, he writes like Thompson in that he draws on a broad range of references from Hegel to the latest pop movies. He is incredibly erudite and learned, just like Thompson. He differs from Thompson, however, in that he is a Marxist and therefore also a materialist. But he is funny and witty and cranky.</p>
<p>There is also Camille Paglia who is broadly learned and erudite with a sweeping interest in the humanities and a very sharp tongue. Her best days, however, I think are behind her. Try one of her essay collections.</p>
<p>There is also Jean Baudrillard, who is a sort of French po-mo equivalent of Thompson. He is very readable and insightful about culture, top or pop. One of his best collections is called &#8220;Screened Out,&#8221; and it&#8217;s a good place to start, since his essays there are particularly readable and intelligible.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t let me forget Paul Virilio, another great French thinker. He is still alive and he is very good at commenting on technology, especially military technology and its recent transformations. Unlike Baudrillard, he is more of a traditional humanist. He is not difficult to read or understand and he is very insightful about media. If you like McLuhan, I recommend him particularly. Try &#8220;Open Sky&#8221; or &#8220;The Original Accident&#8221; or &#8220;City of Panic.&#8221;</p>
<p>You might also try my book on movies which is heavily indebted to Thompson, who wrote the Forward for it. It&#8217;s available on Amazon. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s about it, as far as I know. Nowadays well rounded intellectuals are few and far between. Academe has crushed them by insisting upon degrees and specialization and so the days of Lewis Mumford, Marshall McLuhan and Bill Thompson are pretty much a thing of the past.</p>
<p>Publishers and greedy agents are also to blame, for they no longer take chances on intellectual writers since all they&#8217;re looking to do is make a buck. Integrity, as far as I can tell, can no longer be found amongst publishers or agents, so many intellectuals, such as myself, have had to resort to Print on Demand or self publishing, which renders you effectively invisible. The insistence on making money is essentially screening out and preventing new intellectuals who are not affiliated with Academe from emerging into the spotlight. If you are too intellectual, trade publishers will not publish you; and if you go to academic publishers, they will tell you your work is not academic enough. So we have lost that middle ground which once could serve as a forum in which public intellectuals (and I don&#8217;t mean journalists of the Thomas Friedman type here) like Lewis Mumford or Jane Jacobs could function. </p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
John David Ebert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/contact/comment-page-1/#comment-612</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 00:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/wp/contact/#comment-612</guid>
		<description>Thanks for uploading William Irwin Thompson to YouTube! I return again and again to Thompson and Gregory Bateson, in whatever form I can find them.  When I was younger and more absorbent, I got lost in those two.  Their ideas have kept me permanently open, intellectually nimble, curious and awed.

Is there anyone you know of now who thinks and writes like Thompson did?  Who is it that you read?

Thanks in advance !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for uploading William Irwin Thompson to YouTube! I return again and again to Thompson and Gregory Bateson, in whatever form I can find them.  When I was younger and more absorbent, I got lost in those two.  Their ideas have kept me permanently open, intellectually nimble, curious and awed.</p>
<p>Is there anyone you know of now who thinks and writes like Thompson did?  Who is it that you read?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
