<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Cinema Discourse</title>
	<link>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com</link>
	<description>Movies as mythologically informed literature.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on On The Clone Wars by Bill Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/2008/08/17/on-the-clone-wars/#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 02:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/2008/08/17/on-the-clone-wars/#comment-572</guid>
		<description>"Somebody say Amen."  Amen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Somebody say Amen.&#8221;  Amen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skulls by Kenneth Hanley</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/2008/05/30/on-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skulls/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Hanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 20:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/2008/05/30/on-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skulls/#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Hello John,
 
I saw this movie last week and was very disappointed. I actually thought it was bad, but not as bad as War of the Worlds. In my opinion, Spielberg's good days are behind him. After watching it, however, I did find myself thinking again of the old and fairly common tradition of elongating skulls, such as was done in Egypt, the Middle East, and in the Americas, etc. I actually have not studied the origins of this particular tradition in these places with the exception of Central America, where I remember reading that this shape was supposed to resemble a head of corn/maize among the Maya royals, which makes sense. Apparently, this Maya tradition is well documented, but I do not know if it was the exclusive privilege of royal males, although I would assume so. Since the corn/maize plant was one of the models for their World Tree, this caused me to wonder whether the elongated skull in these other places might be connected to the World Tree/Mountain as well. I think this is not unlikely.
 
You know, just for the record, I have never attributed, in my mind/imagination, the discovery and development of the mythical "arts of civilization" to aliens, like Spielberg has so consistently done.  This seems like a very Hebraic thing to do. Nietzsche, on the other hand, I think, would have attributed these same developments to our own ancestors, as I do.
 
Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello John,</p>
<p>I saw this movie last week and was very disappointed. I actually thought it was bad, but not as bad as War of the Worlds. In my opinion, Spielberg&#8217;s good days are behind him. After watching it, however, I did find myself thinking again of the old and fairly common tradition of elongating skulls, such as was done in Egypt, the Middle East, and in the Americas, etc. I actually have not studied the origins of this particular tradition in these places with the exception of Central America, where I remember reading that this shape was supposed to resemble a head of corn/maize among the Maya royals, which makes sense. Apparently, this Maya tradition is well documented, but I do not know if it was the exclusive privilege of royal males, although I would assume so. Since the corn/maize plant was one of the models for their World Tree, this caused me to wonder whether the elongated skull in these other places might be connected to the World Tree/Mountain as well. I think this is not unlikely.</p>
<p>You know, just for the record, I have never attributed, in my mind/imagination, the discovery and development of the mythical &#8220;arts of civilization&#8221; to aliens, like Spielberg has so consistently done.  This seems like a very Hebraic thing to do. Nietzsche, on the other hand, I think, would have attributed these same developments to our own ancestors, as I do.</p>
<p>Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skulls by Bill Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/2008/05/30/on-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skulls/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 13:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/2008/05/30/on-indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skulls/#comment-262</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

Well, I think you forgot the movie in your excursus on technology.  Fact is, the movie trivializes politics, caricatures the Russkies who were then creating the space age with sputnik, and makes a roadrunner cartoon out of myth.  Given all you know about myth, don't you think you have the cart before the horse?  The extraterrestrial gods come first, bringing the arts of civilization to primitives; then a more organized society creates the cult of the ancestors because they are in the Dreamtime of origin closer to the time of contact with the extraterrestrial gods. The new conservatism helps to keep the new priest class in power.  Who says we should revere the ancestors?  The priests, of course, who are threatened by innovation.  Remember when Xeng Hu in the Ming dynasty sailed around the Indian Ocean in 1433 in huge ships and challenged the ancestor worship and Confucian conservatism of the Eunuch bureaucrats at court, the Eunuchs responded by burning his maps and records and moving the Ming capital inland from coastal Nanking. China was then the world's most advanced civilization, but when it withdrew from world projection, the rapacious Portuguese and Spanish jumped in, with tragic consequences.  Ancestor worship and the distrust of innovation is no great thing. 

Interestingly enough in the pop Roswell Myth, the ETs are said to have warned our leaders of the danger of atomic weapons wiping out all life on earth--hence the fact that neither we nor the Russkies have used them in war--and in compensation the ETs are supposed to have given us all the new things that have lead to the rapid acceleration of postindustrial civilization since 1948. So the myth of the ETs as culture heroes bringing the arts of civilization and "cargo" (chez Diamond) to primitives still continues. The fact that the movie is about gods and not ancestors is also revealed when the NKVD colonel demands to see all knowledge and disintegrates in the process, as this is literal quote of the myth of Dionysos and Semele.

I think you need to add on a couple more paragraphs to your review to critique the movie.  The decay of the 1970s mythic movie into a Hanna Barbera cartoon is also part of the decadence you are tracking.

Yours,

William Irwin Thompson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>Well, I think you forgot the movie in your excursus on technology.  Fact is, the movie trivializes politics, caricatures the Russkies who were then creating the space age with sputnik, and makes a roadrunner cartoon out of myth.  Given all you know about myth, don&#8217;t you think you have the cart before the horse?  The extraterrestrial gods come first, bringing the arts of civilization to primitives; then a more organized society creates the cult of the ancestors because they are in the Dreamtime of origin closer to the time of contact with the extraterrestrial gods. The new conservatism helps to keep the new priest class in power.  Who says we should revere the ancestors?  The priests, of course, who are threatened by innovation.  Remember when Xeng Hu in the Ming dynasty sailed around the Indian Ocean in 1433 in huge ships and challenged the ancestor worship and Confucian conservatism of the Eunuch bureaucrats at court, the Eunuchs responded by burning his maps and records and moving the Ming capital inland from coastal Nanking. China was then the world&#8217;s most advanced civilization, but when it withdrew from world projection, the rapacious Portuguese and Spanish jumped in, with tragic consequences.  Ancestor worship and the distrust of innovation is no great thing. </p>
<p>Interestingly enough in the pop Roswell Myth, the ETs are said to have warned our leaders of the danger of atomic weapons wiping out all life on earth&#8211;hence the fact that neither we nor the Russkies have used them in war&#8211;and in compensation the ETs are supposed to have given us all the new things that have lead to the rapid acceleration of postindustrial civilization since 1948. So the myth of the ETs as culture heroes bringing the arts of civilization and &#8220;cargo&#8221; (chez Diamond) to primitives still continues. The fact that the movie is about gods and not ancestors is also revealed when the NKVD colonel demands to see all knowledge and disintegrates in the process, as this is literal quote of the myth of Dionysos and Semele.</p>
<p>I think you need to add on a couple more paragraphs to your review to critique the movie.  The decay of the 1970s mythic movie into a Hanna Barbera cartoon is also part of the decadence you are tracking.</p>
<p>Yours,</p>
<p>William Irwin Thompson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on William Irwin Thompson Comments by Bill Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/2008/04/29/william-irwin-thompson-comments/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 16:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/2008/04/29/william-irwin-thompson-comments/#comment-165</guid>
		<description>Jonathan, that is funny about patchouli!  Jerry Brown kept Lindisfarne a good secret.  He was tarred with the brush of San Francisco Zen Center, where the Lindisfarne Fellows would meet two or three times.  That is why he was called the Zen Governor.

As for Obama, I hope he can win in Indiana, but it is more likely to go the way of Pennsylvania.  But let's hope.  We, at least here in Maine, lined up the falling snow in a queue four blocks long to vote for Obama.  And Maine is not a rich state; it is very working class.

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan, that is funny about patchouli!  Jerry Brown kept Lindisfarne a good secret.  He was tarred with the brush of San Francisco Zen Center, where the Lindisfarne Fellows would meet two or three times.  That is why he was called the Zen Governor.</p>
<p>As for Obama, I hope he can win in Indiana, but it is more likely to go the way of Pennsylvania.  But let&#8217;s hope.  We, at least here in Maine, lined up the falling snow in a queue four blocks long to vote for Obama.  And Maine is not a rich state; it is very working class.</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on William Irwin Thompson Comments by Jonathan Northrop</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/2008/04/29/william-irwin-thompson-comments/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Northrop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 02:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/2008/04/29/william-irwin-thompson-comments/#comment-162</guid>
		<description>I'm mixed on this. On one hand I wish Obama hadn't done the politician shuffle and tired to patiently point out a subtler level of consciousness to the American mob-mentality. On the other hand I can see the need for it, given the average level of comprehension in the US. It is so patently absurd how the media has blown some of the things Wright has said way out of proportion; whenever I hear a Wright quote after I've heard the media backlash, I have the same response: "That's all he said? Are you kidding me?" Yet because of the absurdity it seems Obama has to sanitize himself, dumb himself down even. Yet no matter what he is saying, his wavelength seems to come through. 

Interesting note re: the possible Jerry Brown administration. Yet another instant of what could have been, if things had went a different way (Or are you saying that Lindisfarne is indirectly responsible for Reagan's presidency by adding to Brown's patchouli-scented patina?). It seems history--personal and collective--is littered with such instances; on a personal level it is easier to see the "greater good" that can come from what seems like a bad experience at the time, yet on the collective level it seems more difficult. Didn't we think that things would change and people would rise up after living through eight years of Ronald Reagan? What about eight years of Bush? Do we need eight years of McCain/Rice/Huckabee? 

My hope is that given the last eight years, and the fact that Obama is the first politician that most people born after John and Bobby Kennedy have actually been inspired by, enough slacker Gen-Xers will crawl out of their basements to vote. To quote your blog, Obama inspires us to "hope that there really is hope."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m mixed on this. On one hand I wish Obama hadn&#8217;t done the politician shuffle and tired to patiently point out a subtler level of consciousness to the American mob-mentality. On the other hand I can see the need for it, given the average level of comprehension in the US. It is so patently absurd how the media has blown some of the things Wright has said way out of proportion; whenever I hear a Wright quote after I&#8217;ve heard the media backlash, I have the same response: &#8220;That&#8217;s all he said? Are you kidding me?&#8221; Yet because of the absurdity it seems Obama has to sanitize himself, dumb himself down even. Yet no matter what he is saying, his wavelength seems to come through. </p>
<p>Interesting note re: the possible Jerry Brown administration. Yet another instant of what could have been, if things had went a different way (Or are you saying that Lindisfarne is indirectly responsible for Reagan&#8217;s presidency by adding to Brown&#8217;s patchouli-scented patina?). It seems history&#8211;personal and collective&#8211;is littered with such instances; on a personal level it is easier to see the &#8220;greater good&#8221; that can come from what seems like a bad experience at the time, yet on the collective level it seems more difficult. Didn&#8217;t we think that things would change and people would rise up after living through eight years of Ronald Reagan? What about eight years of Bush? Do we need eight years of McCain/Rice/Huckabee? </p>
<p>My hope is that given the last eight years, and the fact that Obama is the first politician that most people born after John and Bobby Kennedy have actually been inspired by, enough slacker Gen-Xers will crawl out of their basements to vote. To quote your blog, Obama inspires us to &#8220;hope that there really is hope.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on William Irwin Thompson Comments by Bill Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/2008/04/29/william-irwin-thompson-comments/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 16:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/2008/04/29/william-irwin-thompson-comments/#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Jonathan,In 1980 Jerry Brown would attend some of the Lindisfarne Fellows meetings and he appointed some of our folks to positions in his administration: Gregory Bateson, Stewart Brand, Sim Van der Ryn, Rusty Schweickart, and Ty Cashman.  Then Brown got hammered as "Governor Moonbeam" and his efforts toward a Green architecture and alternative energy were ridiculed.  Governor Reagan and not Governor Brown became America's beloved.  Through lobbies, think tanks, and ownership of the media, the corporate directors and donors to campaigns used issues like abortion to deflect America's attention from their hostile take-over of the country.  It was a three card Monty street scam.  America fell for it, and is still falling for it.  Obama is trying to bring in a new and different energy-field, but notice how he is blocked by all his staffers and advisers.  I think he should not have repudiated Rev. Jeremiah Wright, but shown how the media were quoting him out of context and trying to make any idea that wasn't ABC-Disney based dismissed as "radical."  We will see if Obama loses Indiana to see just how effective this media destruction of Obama and Wright is.

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan,In 1980 Jerry Brown would attend some of the Lindisfarne Fellows meetings and he appointed some of our folks to positions in his administration: Gregory Bateson, Stewart Brand, Sim Van der Ryn, Rusty Schweickart, and Ty Cashman.  Then Brown got hammered as &#8220;Governor Moonbeam&#8221; and his efforts toward a Green architecture and alternative energy were ridiculed.  Governor Reagan and not Governor Brown became America&#8217;s beloved.  Through lobbies, think tanks, and ownership of the media, the corporate directors and donors to campaigns used issues like abortion to deflect America&#8217;s attention from their hostile take-over of the country.  It was a three card Monty street scam.  America fell for it, and is still falling for it.  Obama is trying to bring in a new and different energy-field, but notice how he is blocked by all his staffers and advisers.  I think he should not have repudiated Rev. Jeremiah Wright, but shown how the media were quoting him out of context and trying to make any idea that wasn&#8217;t ABC-Disney based dismissed as &#8220;radical.&#8221;  We will see if Obama loses Indiana to see just how effective this media destruction of Obama and Wright is.</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on William Irwin Thompson Comments by Jonathan Northrop</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/2008/04/29/william-irwin-thompson-comments/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Northrop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 05:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/2008/04/29/william-irwin-thompson-comments/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Bill, my response was written before I saw your addendum. I certainly agree and have seen Wright taken continually out of context. I find it sadly amusing when Patriotic America becomes apoplectic over such statements as "Rich white people control America." One perspective would be to look at Wright as Obama's shadow, that to accept Obama--and everything he represents--we also have to re-visit, and embrace, our country's terrible history of bigotry and racial suffering. Of course to really do this we need a Lakota or Tsalagi vice president, which won't happen for the next couple centuries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, my response was written before I saw your addendum. I certainly agree and have seen Wright taken continually out of context. I find it sadly amusing when Patriotic America becomes apoplectic over such statements as &#8220;Rich white people control America.&#8221; One perspective would be to look at Wright as Obama&#8217;s shadow, that to accept Obama&#8211;and everything he represents&#8211;we also have to re-visit, and embrace, our country&#8217;s terrible history of bigotry and racial suffering. Of course to really do this we need a Lakota or Tsalagi vice president, which won&#8217;t happen for the next couple centuries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on William Irwin Thompson Comments by Jonathan Northrop</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/2008/04/29/william-irwin-thompson-comments/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Northrop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 05:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/2008/04/29/william-irwin-thompson-comments/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Bill,
Actually, I just finished At the Edge of History (and Passages about Earth) just a few days ago, so the quote was fresh in my mind. It is interesting to note how resonant your almost four decade old speculations were today, yet it somehow seems that we have continually put off a significant breakthrough to a higher level of consciousness through the Borg-like dominance of corporate media and our own desire to be numbed. I am often struck, when I read speculations from the past, how the year 2000 came and went and we're still stuck somewhere in the late 20th century, as if we got lost in some mid-90s virtual reality movie and have just been circling around, winding down, waiting. But the oil is running out, and I suppose, as is usually the case, we will be forced to change at the last moment or perish. It may be that these breakthroughs will come, are coming (and came), in a similar fashion to the catastrophes: rolling thunder rather than big bang. But I'm still looking for that noticeable critical mass effect...

To respond to your perhaps rhetorical question, unfortunately I don't think Americans as a whole are capable of the relatively moderate degree of subtlety of cognition to see beyond the black-and-white vision stimulated by Rovian tactics, Republican morality, and mass media. A small percentage will, but not enough. However, I'm hoping that enough people vote for Obama despite of that, if only because he is hipper than Clinton or McCain. If Obama takes the reins in Chocolate City because enough college students fawn over him, I can live with that.

Jonathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,<br />
Actually, I just finished At the Edge of History (and Passages about Earth) just a few days ago, so the quote was fresh in my mind. It is interesting to note how resonant your almost four decade old speculations were today, yet it somehow seems that we have continually put off a significant breakthrough to a higher level of consciousness through the Borg-like dominance of corporate media and our own desire to be numbed. I am often struck, when I read speculations from the past, how the year 2000 came and went and we&#8217;re still stuck somewhere in the late 20th century, as if we got lost in some mid-90s virtual reality movie and have just been circling around, winding down, waiting. But the oil is running out, and I suppose, as is usually the case, we will be forced to change at the last moment or perish. It may be that these breakthroughs will come, are coming (and came), in a similar fashion to the catastrophes: rolling thunder rather than big bang. But I&#8217;m still looking for that noticeable critical mass effect&#8230;</p>
<p>To respond to your perhaps rhetorical question, unfortunately I don&#8217;t think Americans as a whole are capable of the relatively moderate degree of subtlety of cognition to see beyond the black-and-white vision stimulated by Rovian tactics, Republican morality, and mass media. A small percentage will, but not enough. However, I&#8217;m hoping that enough people vote for Obama despite of that, if only because he is hipper than Clinton or McCain. If Obama takes the reins in Chocolate City because enough college students fawn over him, I can live with that.</p>
<p>Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on William Irwin Thompson Comments by Bill Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/2008/04/29/william-irwin-thompson-comments/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 04:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/2008/04/29/william-irwin-thompson-comments/#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Jonathan, I wish to correct the last paragraph of my first remark.  I have now had time to hear Jeremiah Wright's address in full and other postings on the Web.  Obviously, Rev. Wright is not uniting with Clinton and McCain against Obama; rather, it is the news and political ads that are being used to quote him out of context that are being joined to Clinton's and McCain's campaigns so as to damage the perception of Obama in the eyes of white working class voters.  There is nothing abhorent or unpatriotic about Jeremiah Wright's remarks, and it should be allowed in a full range of political discourse and not categorized as "radical" or the ravings of a cult leader. The New York Times and Salon.com brand Wright as a narcissist, but do not address themselves to the substance of his remarks. 

I wish our elections were limited to 60 days, to true debates on CSpan without questions from shallow network reporters, and that political ads were not allowed at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan, I wish to correct the last paragraph of my first remark.  I have now had time to hear Jeremiah Wright&#8217;s address in full and other postings on the Web.  Obviously, Rev. Wright is not uniting with Clinton and McCain against Obama; rather, it is the news and political ads that are being used to quote him out of context that are being joined to Clinton&#8217;s and McCain&#8217;s campaigns so as to damage the perception of Obama in the eyes of white working class voters.  There is nothing abhorent or unpatriotic about Jeremiah Wright&#8217;s remarks, and it should be allowed in a full range of political discourse and not categorized as &#8220;radical&#8221; or the ravings of a cult leader. The New York Times and Salon.com brand Wright as a narcissist, but do not address themselves to the substance of his remarks. </p>
<p>I wish our elections were limited to 60 days, to true debates on CSpan without questions from shallow network reporters, and that political ads were not allowed at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on William Irwin Thompson Comments by Bill Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/2008/04/29/william-irwin-thompson-comments/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cinemadiscourse.com/2008/04/29/william-irwin-thompson-comments/#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Dear Jonathan,

Yes, we will have a series of rolling thunder catastrophes and not a big bang apocalypse.  And some of the catastrophes will not be visible and have already happened.  You are not old enough to remember the last sentence of my second book, AT THE EDGE OF HISTORY (1971), so I will retype it here: "But the time has come; the revelation has already occurred, and the guardian seers have seen the lightning strike the darkness we call reality. And now we sleep in the brief interval between the lightning and the thunder."

I too shudder to think of our country under McCain or the Clintons.  Since Bill Clinton has made over a hundred million dollars as an ex President, imagine the business he will be able to do on the back porch of the White House as First Laddie. The corruption of a Clinton regime could rival the worst sort of Latin American presidential dictatorship. I hope Obama can recover, but the Republican hate and attack machine hasn't even started to work him over. People are going to have to be really smart this year and look through all the Rove tactics and swiftboating.  Are we Americans capable of this?

WIT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Jonathan,</p>
<p>Yes, we will have a series of rolling thunder catastrophes and not a big bang apocalypse.  And some of the catastrophes will not be visible and have already happened.  You are not old enough to remember the last sentence of my second book, AT THE EDGE OF HISTORY (1971), so I will retype it here: &#8220;But the time has come; the revelation has already occurred, and the guardian seers have seen the lightning strike the darkness we call reality. And now we sleep in the brief interval between the lightning and the thunder.&#8221;</p>
<p>I too shudder to think of our country under McCain or the Clintons.  Since Bill Clinton has made over a hundred million dollars as an ex President, imagine the business he will be able to do on the back porch of the White House as First Laddie. The corruption of a Clinton regime could rival the worst sort of Latin American presidential dictatorship. I hope Obama can recover, but the Republican hate and attack machine hasn&#8217;t even started to work him over. People are going to have to be really smart this year and look through all the Rove tactics and swiftboating.  Are we Americans capable of this?</p>
<p>WIT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
