Movies as mythologically informed literature. Cinema Discourse looks at current and classic movies from a literary, and particularly a mythological, point of view.
We also have top movie reviews, current movie reviews, film ratings, movie blogs and movie history.
30th May 2009

On X-Men Origins: Wolverine

posted in Uncategorized |

X-Men Origins: Wolverine: A Movie Review 

By John David Ebert 

There is a scene in this movie that occurs early on which shows how Wolverine derived his enormous physical strength. He was part of a government experiment that involved injecting his bones with an indestructible metal called “adamantean.” We watch as Wolverine descends into a tank full of water and a series of needles inject his body at various points with a liquid form of this metal which coats all his bones, effectively transubstantiating their calcium into a mythical metal that is indestructible. 

This is, of course, an old shamanic motif: shamans, during their initiatory ordeals, normally have visions in which they are torn to pieces either by some ancestral being or a totem animal — in Mesoamerica, this was the jaguar — and then their bodies are reconstructed using some type of higher, stronger substance, such as crystals or rocks. The “death” and “rebirth” of Wolverine, then, is a retrieval of ancient shamanic practices that were once especially common amongst hunting societies, including Native Americans. 

“Wolverine” was actually a character in Native American mythology, just as was Batman, Spiderman, the Black Panther, and many others. This was also true of many of the villains: Batman’s nemesis Two Face, for example, first appeared as a clay mask carved at the early Mesoamerican site of Tlatilco; Spiderman’s nemesis Lizardman also appears in Native American myth, as does the Sandman. And indeed, the mythic archetype of the Twins was the primary Native American mythic structure, and the dual identities of characters like Superman / Clark Kent, Spiderman / Peter Parker, Batman / Bruce Wayne is a variation on this twin myth. 

X-Men Origins: Wolverine is not a particularly good film (it is full of cliches and has no interesting villains), but it serves as an occasion to remind us of the acculturation process that has been, and still is going on in American culture as Native American myth formations slowly thrust up into the field of our culture. Such processes, moreover, are entirely unconscious and they happen everywhere whenever a new people moves into a landscape: the myths and myth-motifs of the aboriginal populations slowly, but ever so surely, begin over time to surface into the imagery of the dominant culture’s discursive vocabulary. It doesn’t happen by anyone’s conscious consent or control, either. Jung once remarked, after visiting America, on how the skylines of our cities resemble those of Native American pueblos. There was, of course, no conscious intent on the part of the inventors of the skyscraper to imitate the rectangular formations of such pueblos, it is just that the landscape has its own morphogenetic fields, as it were, through which the incoming cultural forms are gradually forced to express themselves.It is in this way that the conquered peoples of the native populations all over the globe gradually achieve a sort of victory over the peoples who once dominated them. 

I have long suspected comic book superheroes of representing such an acculturation process in American civilization. The taking off and putting on of masks is an essential attribute of Native American culture, just as it is a basic staple of the myth of the American born and made costumed crusader. Native American myth is inherently polytheistic and now, in the guise of comic book folklore, American Christian culture is gradually being perfused with Native American mythic structures which are causing it to undergo transformation into something that resembles polytheism. Comic book superheroes are an American mythology and they represent the slow, gradual inevitable victory of the American Indian psyche over that of the incoming White Protestant culture that displaced, dispossessed and degraded it. 

Thus, the whites who thought themselves victorious over the Native Americans, closed off into reservations (or are they concentration camps?) had a surprise in store, for the future of their pop culture was destined to become the property of the Native American mind, just as the Grail legends of Europe arose out of the native influence of Celtic mythology, with all its cups and vessels of inexhaustible renewal, upon the incoming Christian mythology that was imported and instituted by force onto the European psyche.This is only the first, and still early, phase of the process of the victory of the Native Americans over Anglo-American culture; later, other, unpredictable forms of Native American influenced religiosity will ultimately create new and surprising American mythologies. The cult of Christian snake-handlers is perhaps one such example. 

Thus, though X-Men Origins: Wolverine is actually a rather poor example of the genre, it serves to remind us that the acculturation process is still ongoing, and the dismantling of the Euro-American psyche is well underway. Make no mistake about it: we owe comic book superheroes and their present success to the Native Americans, and they should actually be credited with playing a huge, though entirely unintentional and unconscious, role in its creation. And this is no mere blut and boden theory, either. Cultural processes are rooted in the landscape, from which they derive their character and style, just as a child inherits many of its neuroses from the particular anxieties of its parents. 

American popular culture is largely a creation of its dispossessed peoples: without Africans, there would be no jazz and no rock and roll. Without Native Americans, there would be no comic book superheroes. Thus, much of the strength and vitality of American pop comes from the semiotics of its dispossessed and discredited peoples, and it is largely to these peoples that it owes its vigor. Don’t bother seeing Wolverine, though, it’s a waste of your money, but if you do, think on these things.

This entry was posted on Saturday, May 30th, 2009 at 8:52 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

There are currently 9 responses to “On X-Men Origins: Wolverine”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On May 31st, 2009, Jacques de Beaufort said:

    very interesting..

    I’m currently teaching a World art class and just assigned a project where the students had to compare the Tatanua mask rituals of New Ireland to the Kwakiutl masks of the Pacific NW. It’s very interesting to me that two cultures so distant in time and space have evolved such a similar method of worship with regards to their ancestor spirits. I’m sure this could be said of countless other cultures and tribes that engage in animistic and totemistic practices.

    The Pre-Columbian religion of the Americas was largely polytheistic, shamanistic, and animistic with the exception of the Inka, who’s sun-orship and theocratic style of governance starts to resemble something more henotheistic if not monotheistic. Makes me think of the other great proto-monotheist figure, Akhenaten. I wonder what specific cultural factors have allowed the consolidation of spiritual and ideological power beneath the umbrella of a spiritual mono-culture and away from the more heterogenous practices that come before them ? More importantly, what allows these cultural practices once established to resist spiritual variety with such great tenacity ? Any thoughts ?

  2. 2 On May 31st, 2009, John David Ebert said:

    Yes, and the zone in particular that you are talking about stretches from equatorial Africa across the Pacific Ocean to the New World and was identified by Leo Frobenius as one of his Kulturkreis zones, that is to say, an area full of shared motifs, myths and artistic styles. The bent knee posture of ancestor figurines, for example, is found distributed throughout this zone, as is also the totem pole and the tradition of mask-making and wearing. This is the great zone of ancestor worship, if we also throw in China and Japan, and so it is extremely conservative. So any similarities between traditions found in this zone, no matter how far apart, should come as no surprise. This is why we find so many motifs shared in common between China, for example, and the Mesoamerican civilizations (and which is not only unrecognized amongst Mesoamerican scholars but specifically denounced by them as a heresy since their specialization forces them to pretend that they are blind to all the other traditions). Between the Chinese and the Mesoamericans, for example, we find the use of jade and cinnabar in grave burials, the custom of placing jade beads in the mouth of the dead, ancestor worship, sky dragons that bring rain, turquoise or greenstone mosaics, similar artistic motifs such as the t’ao t’ieh and so on. Once, about ten or fifteen years ago, one of the news magazines featured an article about a Beijing scholar who claimed he could read Shang Dynasty hieroglyphs carved onto the jade celts of the Olmecs. All of which is complete and total heresy amongst academics since they want to force the world to conform to Euro-American standards of scholarly specialization. The world, however, could care less about Euro-American specialization in the universities and goes its own way without the slightest concern for the narrow minded prejudices and biases of New World scholars. Such motifs are spread across this culture zone, and it is clear to me, at any rate, that the Chinese had a hand at some point in Mesoamerica, probably about the time of the rise of the Olmec which is when the tradition of jade carving first suddenly appears along with all these other motifs.

  3. 3 On May 31st, 2009, Jacques de Beaufort said:

    It IS erie how similar Shang motifs are to Maya glyphs….that was my first thought when I came across them. Take a look at this Kwakiutl mask, something about it is very “Asian”:

    http://www.masksoftheworld.com/NoAmerica/Native%20American%20Mask%20Kwakiutl.htm

    Evolutionary scientists have identified this trend among species..”convergent evolution”. Sheldrake’s morphogenic (genetic?) field seems to be the applicable cultural model. I always felt that the reason so many cultures developed ceremonial architectures that resembled pyramids was because they were just looking to nature for a model and the obvious inspiration was the Mountain. I don’t know if there was ancient trans-pacific naval travel though. Seems like Rapanui was as far as the Polynesians were able to settle. What’s clear to me is that even if these peoples did not communicate directly in “meat space”, they did share a spiritual realm and probably interacted freely within this dimension.

    I know you are writing a book about the Cult of the Dead…
    I was always fascinated by the DMT experience that McKenna described and his conclusion that the entities he encountered were probably spirits of dead people. This is satisfying somehow..it’s very sad to think of death as so final and devastating. We always want to forge a connection to eternity and escape the limits of our mortal bodies. Futurists believe that we will soon be able to download our consciousness into an infinite realm of Aeonic light…but to me this strangely Gnostic techno-topian singularity seems oxy-moronic. The manipulation of material through techne has never produced anything but more or different material.

  4. 4 On May 31st, 2009, John David Ebert said:

    Yes, that mask looks almost Japanese or perhaps even Balinese would be better. Have you read Levi-Strauss’s book “The Way of the Masks”? He specifically focuses on Kwakiutl masks, identifying two types, one with mouth open, the Tsonoqua type, and one with lolling tongue. The Tsonoqua type is of a female monster that is related to the Sasquatch myth while the type with the lolling tongue Levi-Strauss suggests is that of a fish hanging out of the mouth. But the lolling tongue type resembles the t’ao t’ieh motif more than anything else, the mask with the lolling tongue that is symbolic of human sacrifice from India to the New World.

    Masks are fascinating stuff. The oldest surviving masks in the world are from Neolithic Palestine, where we find masks made out of stone that seem to resemble skulls. The first masks thus probably represented ancestral spirits of the dead. And at about the same time we have the practice at Pre-Pottery Neolithic Jericho of adorning skulls with plaster and cowrie shells for eyes which is obviously part of an ancestor cult. But it is possible that mask-making took its origins from such adorning of the skulls of the dead.

    I like to think of mask-making — still evoked at Halloween –as fundamentally connected with the cult of the dead and wearing the faces of dead ancestors.

  5. 5 On May 31st, 2009, Jacques de Beaufort said:

    fascinating stuff JDE…you are living encyclopedia.

    I always like to invoke Oscar Wilde whenever discussions of masks occur:

    “Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth. “

  6. 6 On June 1st, 2009, John Lobell said:

    More thoughts on X-Men Origins: Wolverine, by John Lobell

    I wrote in my review of Star Trek on this site about our culture’s continued movement toward domesticating us with cradle to grave control of every aspect of our lives, while the heroes in our movies are going in the opposite direction, toward the undomesticated individual warrior.

    This valorization of the undomesticated individual warrior has not always been the case. Indeed many of the Westerns of the 1950s were about settling down. In the 1954 movie, Vera Cruz, Gary Cooper and Burt Lancaster play mercenaries in Mexico. Lancaster’s character, while charming, enjoys killing and wants the gold (the MacGuffin) for himself. Cooper’s character fights to make money to recover his ranch lost while he was serving in the Civil War, and wants to give the gold to the virtuous rebels. Virtuous is the man of the land.

    The most important Western is, of course, Shane. Here the free roving cattle ranchers who hate fences die, their gun fighter (Jack Palance) dies, and the gun fighter hero, Shane played by Alan Ladd, probably dies. The peaceful farmers live on.

    In the classic westerns, if the gun fighters were heroes, they were reluctant gun fighters, longing to get back to the land and a good woman. A mythology to redomesticate the soldiers returning from World War II. That ends in the 60s with the Sergio Leone’s Westerns staring Clint Eastwood.

    Unlike his brother, Wolverine is a reluctant warrior, but he is a warrior, and at the end of the movie, he is without a woman, without a home, and without memory. A pure warrior.

    So I return to the question that I posed in my Star Trek essay: if we are all in communitarian agreement on the domestication of our once independent natures, why are our movies going in the opposite direction?

  7. 7 On June 1st, 2009, John David Ebert said:

    Well, the images and narratives that come up out of the deep psyche are often completely at odds to our conscious waking orientation. Jung would say that they are “compensatory” to our waking orientation, seeking to redress imbalances that the conscious psyche is overlooking, while McLuhan would say that they are capturing and making visible invisible environments (usually technological ones) which are invisible because of their very omnipresence. The reason that they are omnipresent, of course, is because everyone is consciously agreeing to build and construct them. But the waking mind often gets off course and gets wrapped up in plans and projects that are totally rejected by the supramind of the body and the instincts, and most often, the movies that come out of our imagination are expressions of these deeper instincts. And what these deeper instincts are telling us is that we are under attack by our machines.

    Any culture that obsessively reiterates a motif or a theme or an image in its works of art is trying to work something out that is difficult or that has caught it and tangled it up somehow. Take the Mesoamericans, for instance: the central image of this civilization is that of a great beast, jaguar, demon or monster with open jaws inside of which a human being, usually an ancestor, is struggling to emerge. This means that Mesoamerican civilization was swallowed up by its regression to the bestial level of the instincts and the cult of shamanism with its animal-oriented and astral-plane influenced demonology. This is a civilization that did not have a problem with technology, for it was, comparably speaking, very low tech. Instead, the primary problem which beset it was that of dealing with the astral plane and struggling to retain their humanity and individuality against being depersonalized and disintegrated by astral forces.

    In the opening image of the movie A.I. on the other hand, we are treated to an analogous image that functions in a similar way for us: a woman’s face is opened up to reveal that she is actually not really human at all, despite appearances, but is a cleverly manufactured robot simulacrum of a human being. Here the celluloid image is an X-ray into the central problem that our civilization is finding it difficult to deal with and that is the problem of the machine.

    Perhaps we find the nomadic wanderer attractive — at least unconsciously — because it offers us a glimpse of the freedom that we do not have being chained to mortgage, credit card debt and nine to five jobs. The wanderer is a vision of a human being who comes into the System from outside and because he is not part of the System or captured by it, he can see the situation more clearly of those who are trapped within it, and therefore can act more objectively as a savior figure.

  8. 8 On June 2nd, 2009, Jacques de Beaufort said:

    Nomadic wanderers lived very short lives despite being unchained to mortgage obligations. It seems that it is in our nature to be discomforted by something no matter what. Modern man is frazzled by techne, Mesoamericans were demon-haunted. The Abelam people of New Guinea worship yams….

    Maybe its the Ego itself that is the source of all this. What do you make of Julian Jaynes thesis..?

  9. 9 On June 2nd, 2009, John David Ebert said:

    Haven’t read Jaynes yet, but his idea of dismissing all the gods of the ancient world as mere auditory hallucinations doesn’t sound very promising.

Leave a Reply

     

    CLICK-FOR-CULTURAL-DISCOURSE

     

    newMedia-book

     

    CELEBS-ICONS-book

     

    Ebert books
  • Archives